« The Faithful Wound | Main | Anatomy of a Question »

Whose Side Are You On?

 "They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them." - Rom. 1:29-32

  The ministry of mercy and compassion has always been intended to be an integral part of living God's way. It is often said that "loving them into the Kingdom" is the way to go in terms of evangelistic thought. After all, this is the way Jesus proceeded, isn't it? Now, this in and of itself is a very solid truth. The weakest and most broken among us have a real need to see the the love of Christ. The problems begin when this principle is applied to those with hardened hearts and seared consciences.
  People in this state of mind are not moved by a message of compassion. Unfortunately, the believer who has been endlessly indoctrinated with the "What's so funny 'bout peace love & understanding" gospel will not only continue to do so in futility, but will often amplify it when it's not working in hopes that the added intensity of goodwill can effect a breakthrough. This has led to a rather horrifying extreme.
  An insidious form of "evangelism" has started to take hold in certain segments of Christian society. When someone comes along and tries to relay a more complete gospel message which also "convinces of sin, righteousness, and judgment" along with the more pleasant aspects, they get shouted down...by other Christians! These suffering servants are sold up the river by their own people, and accused of every manner of inflated piety and self-righteousness. The old saw of "you're judging" also gets trotted out in order to shame the poor soul into silence. This is ironic, considering that by engaging in this character assassination, they are only revealing these traits within themselves!
  These tactics are prevalent online, where the promise of anonymity compels sinner and saint alike to brandish their sharpest knives...without warning, without restraint, and without discrimination. It often happens in the presence of the unbeliever in hopes of establishing a trust with them. It's like an undercover cop infiltrating the mob, who's asked to kill someone in cold blood to "prove their loyalty". The popular theory is that doing so will win them over without having to say a word, that it will magically cause the unsaved person to "understand just how much they need Jesus".
  As I was pondering the scripture selection above, I perceived my focus turning sharply toward verse 32: "Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them." I'm a big believer in context. I wanted to show you what Paul was referring to in that verse, the different kinds of wickedness that people of his day(and ours) were committing and supporting in others.
  Christians are not only allying themselves with the unregenerated (as opposed to walking alongside as a voice of reason and conscience), but practically endorsing the sinful attitudes and behaviors that some of the rougher characters frequently bring. Consequently, prolonged exposure causes them to begin emulating those behaviors until you end up not being able to tell the difference between them and the people they originally started out witnessing to. It is a pattern I have, sadly, seen far too many times.
  As important as it is to fulfill the call to evangelism, the call to love God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength, is labeled by Jesus as the greatest commandment. In keeping with this, it is vitally important to distinguish which relationships with unbelievers can be enriching(whether they accept Christ or not) and which can be corrosive. As always, our wise Father gives us the answers we need:

Psa. 94:20 - "Can a corrupt throne be allied with you—one that brings on misery by its decrees?"
Prov. 2:12-15 - “Wisdom will save you from the ways of wicked men, from men whose words are perverse, who leave the straight paths to walk in dark ways, who delight in doing wrong and rejoice in the perverseness of evil, whose paths are crooked and who are devious in their ways.”
Prov. 13:20 - “He who walks with the wise grows wise, but a companion of fools suffers harm.”
Prov. 16:29 - “A violent man entices his neighbor and leads him down a path that is not good.”
I Cor: 15: 33 - "Do not be misled: "Bad company corrupts good character."
Posted on Friday, March 17, 2006 by Registered CommenterSpiderbeavis | Comments3 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

There is a big difference between dropping a potentially corrosive relationship and preventing that relationship from becoming corrosive. I wonder if some friends would be closer to Jesus if we hadn't turned our backs on them when they were so lost and confused.

As for sharing the truth of Jesus Christ though, we can't water it down. If friends leave us because of this, pray for the Holy Spirit to lead them to conversion.

It is strange living in a society that seems to believe that the only deviant behavior left is to believe that deviancy exists!
March 18, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterWilcoB
It is indeed strange that we are supposed to tolerate all kinds of behaviour and language because 'we are christians and should not judge others'...so long as we refrain from talking about christian behaviour and ideals that is...It is equally strange that for quoting scripture you will get ignored but talking dirty seems acceptable and at times is encouraged in different ways by those who then complain about the perverts (although some perverts are more equal than others). And after all, what is a little gossip between friends or sullying someones name because we they are not in our close circle of friends? Seems a lot of people have lot their saltiness which therefore renders them ineffective (Matt 5:13) I don't judge or condemn people, that is up to God, but nor do I need to accept what I know is wrong, whether that is behaviour or language, and pretend it is perfectly fine without stating my side.
March 18, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterballa
I don't think we need to compromise our faith in order to establish friendship or trust with non-believers.

We can be firm in what we believe and stand on them but not be judgmental.

I think we'll be more credible to the unbelievers if they see us uncompromising and preaching what we say but being loving too and loving doesn't mean agreeing with what they do. Correcting can be a form of love too but if we start doing the same things the non-believers does just so we can win them , I don't think that will work. I mean, if they start thinking their behavior or belief is ok, then why would they want change or how would they see the diff'rence between a christian person and one who isn't..

good subject there
March 19, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterjust me
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.